No" is the New "Yes": Four Practices to Reprioritize Your Life

I was sitting with the CEO and senior team of a well-respected organization. One at a time, they told me they spend their long days either in back-to-back meetings, responding to email, or putting out fires. They also readily acknowledged this way of working wasn’t serving them well — personally or professionally.

It’s a conundrum they couldn’t seem to solve. It’s also a theme on which I hear variations every day. Think of it as a madness loop — a vicious cycle. We react to what’s in front of us, whether it truly matters or not. More than ever, we’re prisoners of the urgent.

Prioritizing requires reflection, reflection takes time, and many of the executives I meet are so busy racing just to keep up they don’t believe they have time to stop and think about much of anything.

Too often — and masochistically — they default to “yes.” Saying yes to requests feels safer, avoids conflict and takes less time than pausing to decide whether or not the request is truly important.

Truth be told, there’s also an adrenaline rush in saying yes. Many of us have become addicted, unwittingly, to the speed of our lives — the adrenalin high of constant busyness. We mistake activity for productivity, more for better, and we ask ourselves “What’s next?” far more often than we do “Why this?” But as Gandhi put it, “A ‘no’ uttered from the deepest conviction is better than a ‘yes’ merely uttered to please, or worse, to avoid trouble.”

Saying no, thoughtfully, may be the most undervalued capacity of our times. In a world of relentless demands and infinite options, it behooves us to prioritize the tasks that add the most value. That also means deciding what to do less of, or to stop doing altogether.

Making these choices requires that we regularly step back from the madding crowd. It’s only when we pause — when we say no to the next urgent demand or seductive source of instant gratification — that we give ourselves the space to reflect on, metabolize, assess, and make sense of what we’ve just experienced.

Taking time also allows us to collect ourselves, refuel and renew, and make conscious course corrections that ultimately save us time when we plunge back into the fray.

What follows are four simple practices that serve a better prioritized and more intentional life:

1. Schedule in your calendar anything that feels important but not urgent — to borrow Steven Covey’s phrase. If it feels urgent, you’re likely going to get it done. If it’s something you can put off, you likely will — especially if it’s challenging.

The key to success is building rituals — highly specific practices that you commit to doing at precise times, so that over time they become automatic, and no longer require much conscious intention or energy. One example is scheduling regular time in your calendar for brainstorming, or for more strategic and longer term thinking.

The most recent ritual I added to my life is getting entirely offline after dinner each evening, and on the weekends. I’m only two weeks into the practice, but I know it’s already created space in my mind to think and imagine.

2. As your final activity before leaving work in the evening, set aside sufficient time — at least 15 to 20 minutes — to take stock of what’s happened that day. and to decide the most important tasks you want to accomplish the next day.

Clarifying and defining your priorities — what the researcher Peter Gollwitzer calls “implementation intentions” — will help you to stay focused on your priorities in the face of all the distractions you’ll inevitably face the following day.

3. Do the most important thing on your list first when you get to work in the morning, for up to 90 minutes. If possible, keep your door closed, your email turned off and your phone on silent. The more singularly absorbed your focus, the more you’ll get accomplished, and the higher the quality of the work is likely to be. When you finish, take a break to renew and refuel.

Most of us have the highest level of energy and the fewest distractions in the morning. If you can’t begin the day that way, schedule the most important activity as early as possible. If you’re one of the rare people who feels more energy later in the day, designate that time instead to do your most important activity.

4. Take at least one scheduled break in the morning, one in the afternoon, and leave your desk for lunch. These are each important opportunities to renew yourself so that your energy doesn’t run down as the day wears on. They’re also opportunities to briefly take stock.

Here are two questions you may want to ask yourself during these breaks:

1. Did I get done what I intended to get done since my last break and if not, why not?

2. What do I want to accomplish between now and my next break, and what do I have to say “no” to, in order to make that possible?

By Tony Schwartz          

How to Accomplish More by Doing Less - Marketing Tacks

Two people of equal skill work in the same office. For the sake of comparison, let’s say both arrive at work at 9 am each day, and leave at 7 pm.

Bill works essentially without stopping, juggling tasks at his desk and running between meetings all day long. He even eats lunch at his desk. Sound familiar?

Nick, by contrast, works intensely for approximately 90 minutes at a stretch, and then takes a 15 minute break before resuming work. At 12:15, he goes out for lunch for 45 minutes, or works out in a nearby gym. At 3 pm, he closes his eyes at his desk and takes a rest. Sometimes it turns into a 15 or 20 minute nap. Finally, between 4:30 and 5, Nick takes a 15 minute walk outside.

Bill spends 10 hours on the job. He begins work at about 80 percent of his capacity, instinctively pacing himself rather than pushing all out, because he knows he’s got a long day ahead.

By 1 pm, Bill is feeling some fatigue. He’s dropped to 60 percent of his capacity and he’s inexorably losing steam. Between 4 and 7 pm, he’s averaging about 40 percent of his capacity.

It’s called the law of diminishing returns. Bill’s average over 10 hours is 60 percent of his capacity, which means he effectively delivers 6 hours of work.

Nick puts in the same 10 hours. He feels comfortable working at 90 percent of his capacity, because he knows he’s going to have a break before too long. He slows a little as the day wears on, but after a midday lunch or workout, and a midafternoon rest, he’s still at 70 percent during the last three hours of the day.

Nick takes off a total of two hours during his 10 at work, so he only puts in 8 hours. During that time, he’s working at an average of 80 percent of his capacity, so he’s delivering just under 6 ½ hours of work — a half hour more than Bill.

Because Nick is more focused and alert than Bill, he also makes fewer mistakes, and when he returns home at night, he has more energy left for his family.

It’s not just the number of hours we sit at a desk in that determines the value we generate. It’s the energy we bring to the hours we work. Human beings are designed to pulse rhythmically between spending and renewing energy. That’s how we operate at our best. Maintaining a steady reservoir of energy — physically, mentally, emotionally and even spiritually — requires refueling it intermittently.

Work the way Nick does, and you’ll get more done, in less time, at a higher level of quality, more sustainably.

Create a workplace that truly values a balanced relationship between intense work and real renewal, and you’ll not only get greater productivity from employees, but also higher engagement and job satisfaction.

There’s plenty of evidence that increased rest and renewal serve performance.

Consider a study conducted by NASA, in collaboration with the Federal Aviation Administration, of pilots on long haul flights. One group of pilots was given an opportunity to take 40 minute naps mid-flight, and ended up getting an average of 26 minutes of actual sleep. Their median reaction time improved by 16 percent following their naps.

Non-napping pilots, tested at a similar halfway point in the flight, experienced a 34 percent deterioration in reaction time. They also experienced 22 micro sleeps of 2-10 seconds during the last 30 minutes of the flight. The pilots who took naps experienced none.

Or consider the study that performance expert Anders Ericcson did of violinists at the Berlin Academy of Music. The best of the violinists practiced in sessions no longer than 90 minutes, and took a break in between each one. They almost never practiced more than 4 ½ hours over a day. What they instinctively understood was the law of diminishing returns.

The top violinists also got an average of more than 8 hours of sleep a night, and took a 20-30 minute nap every afternoon. Over a week, they slept 16 hours more than the average American does.

During my 30s and 40s, I wrote three books. I sat at my desk each day from 7 am to 7 pm, struggling to stay focused. Each book took me at least a year to write. For my most recent books, I wrote in a schedule that matched the great violinists — three 90 minute sessions with a renewal break in between each one.

I wrote both those books in six months — investing less than half the number of hours I had for each of my first three books. When I was working, I was truly working. When I was recharging — whether by getting something to eat, or meditating, or taking a run — I was truly refueling.

Stress isn’t the enemy in the workplace. Indeed, stress is the only means by which we can expand capacity. Just think about weightlifting. By stressing your muscles, and then recovering, you gradually build strength. Our real enemy is the absence of intermittent renewal.

by Tony Schwartz

The Magic of Doing One Thing at a Time

Why is it that between 25% and 50% of people report feeling overwhelmed or burned out at work?

It’s not just the number of hours we’re working, but also the fact that we spend too many continuous hours juggling too many things at the same time.

What we’ve lost, above all, are stopping points, finish lines and boundaries. Technology has blurred them beyond recognition. Wherever we go, our work follows us, on our digital devices, ever insistent and intrusive. It’s like an itch we can’t resist scratching, even though scratching invariably makes it worse.

Tell the truth: Do you answer email during conference calls (and sometimes even during calls with one other person)? Do you bring your laptop to meetings and then pretend you’re taking notes while you surf the net? Do you eat lunch at your desk? Do you make calls while you’re driving, and even send the occasional text, even though you know you shouldn’t?

The biggest cost — assuming you don’t crash — is to your productivity. In part, that’s a simple consequence of splitting your attention, so that you’re partially engaged in multiple activities but rarely fully engaged in any one. In part, it’s because when you switch away from a primary task to do something else, you’re increasing the time it takes to finish that task by an average of 25 per cent.

But most insidiously, it’s because if you’re always doing something, you’re relentlessly burning down your available reservoir of energy over the course of every day, so you have less available with every passing hour.

I know this from my own experience. I get two to three times as much writing accomplished when I focus without interruption for a designated period of time and then take a real break, away from my desk. The best way for an organization to fuel higher productivity and more innovative thinking is to strongly encourage finite periods of absorbed focus, as well as shorter periods of real renewal.

If you’re a manager, here are three policies worth promoting:

1. Maintain meeting discipline. Schedule meetings for 45 minutes, rather than an hour or longer, so participants can stay focused, take time afterward to reflect on what’s been discussed, and recover before the next obligation. Start all meetings at a precise time, end at a precise time, and insist that all digital devices be turned off throughout the meeting.

2. Stop demanding or expecting instant responsiveness at every moment of the day. It forces your people into reactive mode, fractures their attention, and makes it difficult for them to sustain attention on their priorities. Let them turn off their email at certain times. If it’s urgent, you can call them — but that won’t happen very often.

3. Encourage renewal. Create at least one time during the day when you encourage your people to stop working and take a break. Offer a midafternoon class in yoga, or meditation, organize a group walk or workout, or consider creating a renewal room where people can relax, or take a nap.

It’s also up to individuals to set their own boundaries. Consider these three behaviors for yourself:

1. Do the most important thing first in the morning, preferably without interruption, for 60 to 90 minutes, with a clear start and stop time. If possible, work in a private space during this period, or with sound-reducing earphones. Finally, resist every impulse to distraction, knowing that you have a designated stopping point. The more absorbed you can get, the more productive you’ll be. When you’re done, take at least a few minutes to renew.

2. Establish regular, scheduled times to think more long term, creatively, or strategically. If you don’t, you’ll constantly succumb to the tyranny of the urgent. Also, find a different environment in which to do this activity — preferably one that’s relaxed and conducive to open-ended thinking.

3. Take real and regular vacations. Real means that when you’re off, you’re truly disconnecting from work. Regular means several times a year if possible, even if some are only two or three days added to a weekend. The research strongly suggests that you’ll be far healthier if you take all of your vacation time, and more productive overall.

A single principle lies at the heart of all these suggestions. When you’re engaged at work, fully engage, for defined periods of time. When you’re renewing, truly renew. Make waves. Stop living your life in the gray zone.

by Tony Schwartz   

DISTILLERY WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL

ABSTRACT

1.             One of the most important environmental problems faced by the world is management of wastes. Industrial processes create a variety of waste water pollutants; which are difficult and costly to treat. Wastewater characteristics and levels of pollutants vary significantly from industry to industry. Now-a-days emphasis is laid on waste minimization and revenue generation through byproduct recovery. Pollution prevention focuses on preventing the generation of wastes, while waste minimization refers to reducing the volume or toxicity of hazardous wastes by water recycling and reuse, and process modifications and the byproduct recovery as a fall out of manufacturing process creates ample scope for revenue generation thereby offsetting the costs substantially.

                                                     

2.             Production of ethyl alcohol in distilleries based on cane sugar molasses constitutes a major industry in Asia and South America.  The world’s total production of alcohol from cane molasses is more than13 million m³/annum.  The aqueous distillery effluent stream known as spent wash is a dark brown highly organic effluent and is approximately 12-15 times by volume of the product alcohol.  It is one of the most complex, troublesome and strongest organic industrial effluents, having extremely high COD and BOD values. Because of the high concentration of organic load, distillery spent wash is a potential source of renewable energy.  The paper reviews the status and appropriate treatment alternatives for disposal of the distillery wastewater.

KEYWORDS

Distillery Spentwash, Revenue Generation, Byproduct Recovery.

INTRODUCTION

1.             Production of ethyl alcohol in distilleries based on cane sugar molasses constitutes a major industry in Asia and South America.  The world’s total production of alcohol from cane molasses is more than13 million m³/annum.  The aqueous distillery effluent stream known as spent wash is a dark brown highly organic effluent and is approximately 12-15 times by volume of the product alcohol.  It is one of the most complex, troublesome and strongest organic industrial effluents, having extremely high COD and BOD values. Because of the high concentration of organic load, distillery spent wash is a potential source of renewable energy. 

2.             The 295 distilleries in India produce 2.7 billion litres of alcohol and generating 40 billion litres of wastewater annually. The enormous distillery wastewater has potential to produce 1100 million cubic meters of biogas. The population equivalent of distillery wastewater based on BOD has been reported to be as high as 6.2 billion which means that contribution of distillery waste in India to organic pollution is approximately seven times more than the entire Indian population. The wastewater from distilleries, major portion of which is spentwash, is nearly 15 times the total alcohol production. This massive quantity, approximately 40 billion litres of effluent, if disposed untreated can cause considerable stress on the water courses leading to widespread damage to aquatic 

                                                    

ALCOHOL MANUFACTURING PROCESS AND NATURE OF DISTILLERY WASTE WATER

           

3.             In India bulk of the alcohol is being produced from sugar cane molasses. Molasses is a thick viscous byproduct of the sugar industry which is acidic in nature, rich in salts, dark brown in colour and it also contains sugar which could not be crystallized. For manufacturing alcohol, the Molasses is diluted with water into a solution containing 15-16 % of sugars. This solution is then inoculated with yeast strain and is allowed to ferment at room temperature. The fermented wash is distilled in a series of distillation columns to obtain alcohol of adequate/ requisite strength and quality/specification. This alcohol is used for various purposes including potable and industrial. For manufacture of alcoholic beverages, the alcohol is, if required, matured and blended with malt alcohol (for manufacture of whisky) and diluted to requisite strength to obtain the desired type of liquor/ Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL). This is bottled in bottles of various sizes for the convenience of consumers.

           

S.No.	Parameter	Range
1.	pH	4.3-5.3
2.	Total Suspended Solids	12,000-14,000
3.	Total Dissolved Solids	45,000-75,000
4.	B.O.D., 20 0C, 5 days	40,000-50,000
5.	C.O.D.	80,000-1,00,000

BIO-ENERGY POTENTIAL FROM DISTILLERY EFFLUENTS

4.             In India there are 295 distilleries producing 3.20 billion litres of alcohol generating 45 billion litres of wastewater annually.  The enormous distillery wastewater has potential to produce 1200 million cubic meters of biogas.  The post methanation wastewater if used carefully for irrigation of agricultural crops can produce more than 85000 tonne of biomass annually. This biogas normally contains 60% methane gas, which is a well-recognized fuel gas with minimum air pollution potential. If this source of energy is tapped, it will fetch additional energy units worth 5 trillion-kilo calories annually. Besides, the Post Methanation Effluent (PME) can provide 245000 tones of potassium, 12500 tones of nitrogen and 2100 tones of phosphorus annually.  Thus the manorial potential of effluent can be measured by the fact that one year’s effluent can meet the potassium requirement of 1.55 million hectare land, nitrogen requirement of 0.13 million hectare land and phosphorus requirement of 0.025 million hectare land if two crops are taken in a year.

Annual Bio energy Potential of Distillery Effluent in Various States of India
State	Units	Capacity (M Ltr/Yr)	Effluent (M Ltr/Yr)	Biogas (M m3)	Total N (tones)	Total Ka (tones)	Biomass (tones)
A P	24	123	1852	50	566	11115	3704
Assam	1	2	24	0.7	7	144	48
Bihar	13	88	1323	35.7	397	7940	2646
Goa	6	15	218	6	65	1304	436
Gujarat	10	128	1919	51.8	576	11511	3838
Karnataka	28	187	2799	75.6	840	16794	5598
M P	21	469	7036	190	2111	42219	14072
Maharashtra	65	625	9367	253	2810	56217	18734
Punjab	8	88	1317	35.6	395	7902	2634
Tamilnadu	19	212	3178	86	953	1971	6356
U P	43	617	9252	250	2776	55512	18504
W B	6	24	371	10.1	111	22223	742
Rajasthan	7	14	202	3	61	1215	404
Kerala	8	23	343	9.3	103	2064	686
Pondicherry	3	11	165	4.5	50	990	330
Sikkim	1	7	98	5.5	29	585	196
Nagaland	1	2	24	0.7	7	144	48
J & K	7	24	366	11	110	2196	732
H P	2	3	39	1	12	234	78
Haryana	5	41	615	16.6	185	3690	1230
Total	285	2703	40,508	1096.1	12,154	263,070	81016

PRESENT STATUS OF TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL

5.             Spent wash treatment is proposed by three different routes currently viz;  (a) Concentration followed by incineration, (b)  Anaerobic digestion with biogas recovery followed by aerobic polishing and  (c) Direct wet oxidation of stillage by air at high temperature with generation of steam followed by aerobic polishing. All of these processes are capital intensive. The incineration process involves an investment of the order of 400% of the distillery cost, whereas the other two processes along with the secondary treatment require an investment of 200-300% of the distillery cost. The unfavourable economics make it difficult to implement these treatment processes on the plant scale. Because anaerobic digestion and wet oxidation are less expensive, these alternatives are more attractive.  However, there is a need for development of a suitable process with lower investments and higher energy recovery.  Many distilleries in India are allowing their effluent for application on land as direct irrigation water, spent wash cake and spent wash-press mud compost. The advances manifesting the possibilities of energy conservation are also discernible in the case of distilleries. The methane gas generated in the digesters is used as a fuel to compensate the energy needs of the industry. A general estimate suggests that the cost of an anaerobic biological digester is recovered within 2-3 years of installation because of substantial saving of coal and other fuels. 

COST RECOVERY METHODS FROM THE DISTILLERY EFFLUENTS

6.             The wastewaters generated during the distillery and brewery operations contain high organic loads. It has a BOD from 30,000 to 60,000 mg/1. So due to this high organic contents, the wastewaters can be subjected to treatment for the produc­tion of biogas, composting, aquaculture and potash recovery.

(a)           BIOGAS.    For the production of biogas from distillery effluent, anaerobic biomethanation of the effluent is adopted, generally.  High rate anaerobic technologies are utilized for biogas generation. Fluidised Bed Reactors and Up flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) Reactors are mostly utilized for the production of biogas from the effluents. Some of the biogas production processes being commercial1y established in India at present are:-

·         BIOTHANE PROCESS:  This process uses the UASB reactor for the production of biogas. This is a stable and automatic process with low operational costs.

·         BIOBED PROCESS: It is similar to Bio thane process. It uses UFB reactors. It needs less installation area and its construction cost is lower compared to any other system.

·         BIOPAQ PROCESS: In this process anaerobic bacteria are used to treat the distillery effluents for the production of biogas. UASB proc­ess is utilized here. The separated sludge in this process makes excellent manure. The generated biogas is used to produce steam for the distillation of alcohol and thus it replaces 50-60% of the total required energy in the process of distillation. For a plant having 40-45,000 kg COD/day 75-80% of COD can be reduced and nearly Rs. 25.50 lakhs can be saved annually for a distillery having 300 working days in a year. The generated biogas from UASB reactor of BioPaq process can be collected and be used as a fuel in gas/dual engine. Through suitable coupling the engine can be coupled with the A/C generator for generation of electricity from biogas. For a 45 klpd distillery 11 KV of power is generated which is then utilized in the distillery thus cut­ting down the power consumption.

·         SULZER' S PROCESS: The technology of this type of biogas plant is provided by Sulzer Brothers Limited, Switzerland. It is specifically made for Indian conditions. A biogas plant at the distillery of Padmashri Dr. Vitthalrao Vikhe Patil S.S.K. Ltd., Pravaranagar, Ahmednagar District, Maharashtra is based on Sulzer's technology. The capacity of this distillery is 6,000 lpd which generates 900 m3 of spent wash per day. The biogas production is in the range of 16,550 to 21,870 m3 per day. The savings in the cost of fuel is in the range of Rs. 312 lakhs to Rs. 652 lakhs per year.

o    ECONOMICS OF THE BIOGAS PLANT OF SULZER’S DESIGN

These calculations are made for a distillery producing 30,000 litres of alcohol per day. The effluent characteristics are for conventional batch type fermentation process.

o    EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS

                                                             Before Treatment              After Treatment

Flow m³/day                                               450                                         450

pH                                                                                4.0 to 4.5                               7.0 to 7.8

BOD mg/l                                                    45,000 to 50,000                 6,000 to 8,000

COD mg/l                                                    80,000 to 1000,000            25,000 to 35,000

o    PERFORMANCE

Reduction of BOD %                                                                                80 to 85 %

Reduction of COD %                                                                                65 to 70 %

Biogas Production Nm³/day                                                                    12,300

Specific Biogas Production Nm³/kg of COD degraded                      0.4 to 0.5

% of methane in biogas                                                                           60 to 65 %

o    ECONOMICS

Calorific value of biogas                                                                          6000 Kcal/ Nm³

Calorific Value of Coal                                                                            4000 Kcal/Kg

Coal equivalent of Biogas per day                                                        18.45 tonnes

Cost of Coal at Rs 1800 per tonne                                                        Rs   33,210 pd

Annual fuel savings                                                                                  Rs   99.63 lacs

Capital cost of plant                                                                                 Rs   230 lacs

Interest at 15 % on 75 % of the capital cost**                                   Rs   26,73,750

Maintenance costs                                                                                    Rs   2,00,000

Staff Salary                                                                                                                Rs   1,50,000

Power 40 KW at Rs 2/- per unit                                                              Rs   5,76,000

Total Annual Cost                                                                                     Rs   36,00,000

Net Savings per year                                                                                 Rs   99.36 – 36

                                                                                                                      = Rs   63.63 lacs

Total Pay back period                                                                              =  230 / 63.63

                                                                                                                      =  3 to 4 years.

(b)   COMPOSTING   In this process, press mud generated from sugar mill is utilised to produce compost by mixing distillery effluent. Both anaerobic and aerobic composting systems are practiced. In some plants composting with treated effluent treated through bio-methanation plant is also practiced. This system can achieve zero effluent if the press mud quantity matches with the effluent generated.

·         ECONOMICS OF BIOEARTH COMPOSTING

Capacity of the Distillery                                                                   50 KLPD

Number of working days in a year

                                In the Distillery                                                                     300

                                In the Composting Plant                                                    275

Generated spentwash                                                                         350 KLPD (Biostil Plant)

Solid content in spentwash                                                                                17 %

Spentwash to Press mud Ratio                                                         2.5 KL : 1 MT

Man Power Required                                                                          50

Culture Requirement                                                                          31.5 MT/annum

Press mud requirement                                                                       43,000 MT/ annum

Cost of Culture                                                                                    Rs   1.75 lakhs per MT

Cost of Press mud                                                                               Rs   12 per MT

Man Power cost                                                                                   Rs   50 per day

Capital Cost                                                                         Rs   175 lakhs (excluding land)

Land Requirement                                                                              25 acres

Bio Earth Production                                                                          38,000 MT per year

Annual Maintenance Costs                                                               1.5 % of equipment costs

% Costs of Funds                                                                                                20 % per annum

·         OPERATION COSTS

Cost of Culture                                                                                    55.13 lakhs

Average Cost of Funds                                                                       17.5 lakhs

Cost of Diesel                                                                                       11.32 lakhs

Cost of Press mud                                                                               5.16 lakhs

Cost of Transportation of Press mud                                              0.00

Annual Man Power Cost                                                                    6.88 lakhs

Depreciation (@ 10 %)                                                                       15.00 lakhs

Maintenance                                                                                        2.25 lakhs

Annual Operational Cost of Compost Plant                                  113.24 lakhs

Cost of One Metric Tonne of Bioearth                           =Annual Operational cost of plant

 

    Compost Produced in MT

=              11324000
38000

                                                                                                                =              Rs  298.00 per MT

·         NET COST/BENEFIT FOR DIFFERENT SELLING PRICES OF COMPOST

                        SP of Bioearth                                    Net Cost / Benefit

in Rs                                                                in Rs

                        0                                                              -11324000.00

                        100.00                                                     -7524000.00

                        200.00                                                     -3724000.00

                        298.00                                                        0.00

                        350.00                                                      1976000.00

                        400.00                                                      3876000.00

                        500.00                                                      7676000.00

Net annual cost/benefit of Compost                       =              Sales value of 38000 MT of compost less annual operating costs

·         COMPUTATION OF PAY BACK PERIOD

1.     SP of Bioearth                                      -               Rs 250.00

                        Initial cash outflow                             -               Rs 17500000.00

                        Net annual cash inflow                      -               Rs 1738000.00

                        Pay Back Period                                  -               10.06 Years (17500000/1738000.00)

2.     SP of Bioearth                                      -               Rs 350.00

                        Initial cash outflow                             -               Rs 17500000.00

                        Net annual cash inflow                      -               Rs 5226000.00

                        Pay Back Period                                  -               3.34 Years (17500000.00/5226000.00)

3.     SP of Bioearth                                      -               Rs 500.00

                        Initial cash outflow                             -               Rs 17500000.00

                        Net annual cash inflow                      -               Rs 10926000.00

                        Pay Back Period                                  -               1.6 Years (17500000.00/10926000.00)

(c)           POTASH RECOVERY   It is done by incinerating the distillery spent wash.  In this process, the raw distillery spent wash is first neutralized with lime and filtered. This is further concentrated to about 60% solids in multiple-effect forcer circulation evaporators. Now this thick liquor from the evaporator is burnt in an incinerator and is converted into ash. The dry solids of the spent wash in the form of coke in the incinerator has an average calorific value of 2 Kcal/kg, which is sufficient for supporting self-combustion of the thick liquor in the incinerator. The resulting ash is found to contain about 37% of potash as potassium oxide on an average. This ash is further leached with water to dissolve the potassium salts. Then it is neutralized with sulphuric acid and is evaporated. The potassium salts are crystallized in a crystal1izer. The crystallized mixed potassium salt contains 73.5% of potassium sulphate (K₂SO₄) 16.5% potassium chloride (KCl) and 5% of sodium salts.  It is estimated that a distillery dis­charging about 300 m³ of spent wash per day could recover 3 tonnes of Potassium as Potassium oxide or about 5.34 tonnes of Potassium sulphate and 1.2 tonnes of Potassium chloride per day.  This potassium is used as a fertilizer.

(d)        DISTILLERY WASTEWATER UTILISATION IN AGRICULTURE    Being very rich in organic matters, the utilisation of distil­lery effluents in agricultural fields creates organic fertilization in the soil which raises the pH of the soil, increases availability of certain nutrients and capability to retain water and also improves the physical structure of soil. Mostly the distillery wastewaters are used for pre-sowing irrigation. The post-harvest fields are filled with distill­ery effluents. After 15-20 days, when the surface is almost dried, the fields are tilled and the crops are sown and subse­quent irrigation is given with fresh water. However, the effluent is diluted 2-3 times before application on crops. Apparently, the irrigation with distillery wastewater seems to be an attractive agricultural practice which not only augments crop yield but also provides a plausible solution for the land disposal of the effluents. One cubic metre of methanated effluent contains nearly 5 kg of potassium, 300 grams of nitrogen and 20 grams of phosphorus. If one centimetre of post methanation effluent is applied on one hectare of agricultural land annually, it will yield nearly 600 kg of potassium, 360 kg of calcium, 100 kg of sulphates, 28 kg of nitrogen and 2 kg of phosphates. The distillery effluent contains 0.6 to 21.5 percent potash as KO, 0.1 to 1.0 percent phosphorus as PO and 0.01 to 1.5 percent Nitrogen as N₂. The irrigational and manorial potential of distillery wastewaters is given below:

i)              Total Volume available in Million m³ /annum                                :                       6.87

ii)             Nutrients Contribution Potential (tonnes/annum)                                            :N            -               69380

                                                                                                                                                PO           -               11335

KO          -               27480

·         ECONOMICAL ASPECTS

When the distillery effluents are used for irrigation in fallow lands, the microbes present in it transform the lands into fertile ones, giving high yields of paddy and sugarcane. Farmers could save nitrogenous fertilisers worth Rs 1335 crores per annum if at least 200 distilleries of out country recycled their wastes to the agricultural fields. However, it is predicted that the utilisation of distillery effluent for irrigation of land would make avail­able nitrogen, phosphorous and potash valued at about Rs 500 crores each year. The added advantage of this application would be that these fertilisers would be available to soil in organic form. As the secondary and tertiary systems for the treatment of distillery effluent are highly energy intensive and according to the estimates of the Union Ministry of Energy a total con­nected load of 200 M.W. would be required to energising these systems if 246 distilleries endeavour to reduce the BOD level of effluent to the extent possible. The generation of the desired energy would need an installed load of 350 M.W. which would require capital investment of the order of about Rs 1400 crores. So it will be an attractive practice to utilise the distillery effluents for ferti-irrigation of land after primary treat­ment, as land is available in abundance around the distiller­ies which are located in the sugarcane belts.

RECOMMENDATIONS

7.            Reviewing the magnitude of pollution potential of distillery wastewaters and the experiences gained  over years  on recovery of residues and treatment of wastewater the following recommendations are made :-

·         In-plant control measures for conservation and reuse of water and good house-keeping for prevention of spillage and leakages should be the prerequisite.

·         For recovery from the treatment of distillery spentwash, depending on the availability and cost of land in a particular area, simple treatment in anaerobic lagoon to generate biogas followed by treatment in aerated lagoon or oxidation ditch may be considered. Where the avail­ability and cost of land are the main constraints, activated sludge type of aeration treatment in a deep oxidation ditch would be more economical than the conventional or extended aeration sludge process.

·         For the treatment of distillery spent wash, removal and/or recovery of yeast should be prerequisite to reduce the load and eliminate certain undue problems in the waste treatment/recovery plants. This recovered yeast can be utilised as a good cattle feed. Recovery of spent grains and yeast and their utilisation as animal feed and feed supplement might be encouraged not only for reducing the pollution load form the wastewaters but also in providing for a reasonable return on their capital investment of the industry.

·         Where the availability of land is a severe constraint, evaporation and incineration of distillery spent wash to recover potash would appear to be the only choice. In spite of high capital investment required for such type of plants, heat recovery would defray significantly the organisation and maintenance costs and contribute towards conservation of energy.

·         In the countries like ours, where indigenous sources of potash are scarce or not available, recovery of potash from crude ash by evaporation and incineration of spent wash would appear to be an economically attractive alternative. If heat recovery is simultaneously used, the pay back period of the plant can be substantially reduced.

·         Anaerobic digestion of spent wash in a closed digester followed by its treatment under an activated sludge process, especially in an oxidation ditch to reduce costs, might be adopted as the most cost-effective system for the distilleries which are located away from sugar factories. Moreover, the treated effluent can be conveniently used for irrigation of cane fields or other crop lands, subsequently.

·         Biogas generated from the distillery effluents, can be effectively utilized in production plant boilers thus saving about 50 to 60 percent fuel/steam. The treated effluent having almost all the potash retained in it may be utilised for irrigation purposes.

·         The utilisation of the distillery effluent in agricul­tural fields will not only enrich these further with essential plant nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorous and potash but also compensate the expenditure on fertilizers for crop growth. This practice will result in revenue generation and further lead to offsetting the costs substantially.

·         Similarly spentwash utilization in bioearth composting, where adequate land is available, being a simple process and not involving any heavy machinery is also one of the cost effective methods of disposal. Moreover it is feasible alternative for utilization of treated effluent; as the same generates revenue thus offsetting the costs and further leading to reduction in pay back period.

CONCLUSION

8.             One of the most important environmental problems faced by the world is management of wastes.
Now-a-days emphasis is laid on waste minimization and revenue generation through byproduct recovery. Pollution prevention focuses on preventing the generation of wastes, while waste minimization refers to reducing the volume or toxicity of hazardous wastes by water recycling and reuse, and process modifications and the byproduct recovery as a fall out of manufacturing process creates ample scope for revenue generation thereby offsetting the costs substantially.

9.             The cost of effluent treatment in distilleries is likely to be compensated substantially by availability of methane gas. Effluent application will reduce the nutrient requirement through fertilisers. However, high salt load, mainly potassium and sulphur, into the soil system may hamper the sustained crop yields due to continued long-term application of effluents. Therefore the effect on crop productivity has to be visualised on long-term and sustainable basis. Application of post methanation effluent suitably diluted according to crop requirements and soil conditions seems to be viable alternative. If all the distilleries present in India resort to biomethanation, then approximately 2.0 million cubic metres of biogas shall be generated per day, with a calorific value of approximately 5000 Kcal/m. This is equivalent to saving of 2240 tonnes of coal per day, in turn avoiding CO of about 3100  tonnes per day.

10.          The present study coupled with the corresponding techno market survey has been aimed at reviewing the existing technological status of treatment and disposal of distillery spentwash in our country and comparing with that of the contemporary international technologies, thus identifying the gaps in the technologies and suggesting an action plan for overcoming these. Some relative issues in the areas of quality criteria with respect to gaps in technologies and financial implication in implementing the technological options, has been highlighted in this study. It has to be stressed that recovery from the distillery effluents is a better way to reduce the cost of wastewater treatment for decreasing its pollution level which is actually a very costly affair. So this is a matter great importance for the Indian distilleries and breweries. Various recommendations are given for the establishment of recovery plants in India. It has also been elucidated during the study that several technological options that are available in our country need to be exploited to the maximum so that, this will help to control the pollution created by the distillery wastewaters and also enable to derive by-products which are commercially beneficial.